ogarawo.wordpress.com
Her new book, “Bones in the does just that, turning the grislh murder of Loretta Bowersock into a cautionarh tale of elderly abuseand control. It also givez a candid look at Loretta’s daughter, Terru Bowersock, as the Phoenix entrepreneur searchess for the mother who helped create hersuccessful Terri’s Consign & Design. Bommersbach says she saw the 2004 murde r as a way to get into the issue of abuse and the fact thateven successful, vibranrt women can fall into the trap.
She also noted that Phoenix has a shelter specifically for eldeeabuse victims: Doves, which can be reached at or ME ME ME: It’s not just the sexy commerciala keeping an international eye on Interneyt domain-name registrar . Big bucks are being tossef aboutas “.me” domains are auctioned. Officially, “me” standds for the country of Montenegro, but that’s hardly the attraction. Date.me fetchedd $70,000 at a recent while love.me brought in $32,500. Chatwith.me is anothef winner at $15,035, and picture.me broughyt home $10,240. Not all that dough will go to however. The Scottsdale company set up another unit to operatesthe “.
me” registry, with 70 percent of proceeds goinvg to the European nation’s government. DINE LIKE THE PRESIDENTs: Barackl Obama isn’t the only one thinking aheadeto January’s inaugural festivities. Lee Hillson, executivw chef at T. Cook’s restaurant at the , has createfd a four-course dinner for January’ menu that plays off past presidential feasts. And he doesn’t want to offend John McCainj supporters. The items cross party inspired by dishes such asthe blue-point oystersz served in 1841 to Willia Henry Harrison and the smooth tomatok soup chosen by John F. Kennedy.
And, of each patron will receive a littlew bag of jelly beans totake home, a la Ronald For more: .
Monday, February 25, 2013
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Duke reaches Save-A-Watt settlement - The Business Review (Albany):
ogarawo.wordpress.com
The Southern Environmental Law Center, whicuh was the lead legal team for theenvironmental groups, announceed the settlement Friday morning. It callx for Save-A-Watt to reducer energy demand by 2 percent over the nextfour years. It sets a targety of reducing demand by as much as 8 percentgby 2020. The environmental groups say that would be the equivalentf of the annual outputfrom Duke’s 825-megawatt expansiobn at the controversial Cliffside coal planr on the border of Cleveland and Rutherfordc counties. The groups say that capping Duke’d profits will protect consumers from unreasonably high chargea forenergy efficiency.
Greater conservation efforts and lower costsx were key issues for environmentalp groups and the Publicd Staff ofthe N.C. Utilities Commission, whicg represents customer interests inutilituy cases, as they fought Duke for two years over Save-A-Watt. Michael Regan, southeast regionapl air-policy expert for the Environmental Defenss Fund says the environmental groups believe the settlemengt makes the program betterfor customers, the environment and for He says the groups want to supporr utilities in their effortxs to provide energy-efficiency programs.
And he says incentives built into the settlement that allow Duke to increasde its rate of return based on achievinvg specified efficiency targets accomplish that Duke also got what it considers an important Duke will be allowed to make a returm on part of what it woulcd have cost to buildx power plants to provide the energy theprogramj saves. Duke has said eliminating compensation basedr onsuch “avoided costs” would be a deal-breaker. Duke contendse such compensation puts efficiency on a more equal footinfg with electricity sales forgenerating profits. Without that kind of Duke has said, efficiency would always take a back seat in business plans.
“The fact that the avoided-cosy model is in there, that it’es based on pay-for-performance and that it is up to us to make sure the programsx really work were all keys to the settlement for says company spokesmanTim Pettit. The public stafrf and environmental groups had opposedthe avoided-costs idea, largelyy on fears that it couldd provide Duke with unreasonable profits. The public staffr also worried about departing from standarcdregulatory practice. In North Carolina, utilities are generalluy allowed to make a return on the moneuthey spend. An avoided-costs model breaks that connection and offers Duke a returmn on money it doesnot spend.
But an importanf concession to the public staff was a decision tomake Save-A-Watt a four-year pilot initiative. The N.C. Utilities Commission will revieaw the program at the end of that period and decide whethef it has performed well enouguh to bemade permanent. The avoided costs outlinedr in the settlement will trac the model Ohio adoptedfor Duke’s version of the Save-A-Watt program in that It reduces the percentage of avoided costs on which Duke can earn a return.
Duke had originallu asked to make a rate of return on 90 percent of what it woulx have cost to provide the energy that was Underthe settlement, Duke will get a return on 50 percenft of the avoided costs for energy-conservation programs and 75 percentt of the avoided costs for programs that shif t use away from peak Like in Ohio, the settlement lets Duke cover what are callexd “lost margins.” Several environmental groups have recognized the need to allow Duke to recover those fixed costs for generating and delivering electricitt when efficiency programs reduce demand. The settlement announced Friday will form the basisd ofa Save-A-Watt proposal Duke will make to S.C.
regulatorsw this summer. The S.C. Public Service Commissiobn rejected Duke’s first proposal in February. Save-A-Watt is an energy-efficiencyg initiative Duke has been touting for The proposal comprises a series of programs to help customerxs use less electricity or shif t their use of powerfrom peak-demand hours to low-use times. Some of the programs — such as discountes for energy-saving light bulbzs and financial incentives tobuy high-efficiencgy appliances — started June 1 in both But neither state has approved the full The has led the environmental groupsz in dissecting the program.
Opponents contended the originap proposal would reward Duke too handsomely and primarily for shiftinyg the use of electricity frombusy times. That wouldf conserve little energy but save utilities Steve Smith, executive director of the says his group’s concern from the beginninh was to make sure Save-A-Watt resulted in significant reductiona in energy use. In Northn Carolina, the commission approved Save-A-Watt’d programs but withheld judgmenyton Duke’s compensation. The commission asked for additionap comments onthe issue. As opponents were formulating their responsexs tothat request, they and Duke resumed negotiation in North Carolina.
Any settlement here couldr create a template for the program inSouthj Carolina. One key feature of the compromisse will be the creationj of an advisory group that will assisft in reviewingfor Save-A-Watt. Duke Energy Carolinas is a divisionof Charlotte-based (NYSE:DUK).
The Southern Environmental Law Center, whicuh was the lead legal team for theenvironmental groups, announceed the settlement Friday morning. It callx for Save-A-Watt to reducer energy demand by 2 percent over the nextfour years. It sets a targety of reducing demand by as much as 8 percentgby 2020. The environmental groups say that would be the equivalentf of the annual outputfrom Duke’s 825-megawatt expansiobn at the controversial Cliffside coal planr on the border of Cleveland and Rutherfordc counties. The groups say that capping Duke’d profits will protect consumers from unreasonably high chargea forenergy efficiency.
Greater conservation efforts and lower costsx were key issues for environmentalp groups and the Publicd Staff ofthe N.C. Utilities Commission, whicg represents customer interests inutilituy cases, as they fought Duke for two years over Save-A-Watt. Michael Regan, southeast regionapl air-policy expert for the Environmental Defenss Fund says the environmental groups believe the settlemengt makes the program betterfor customers, the environment and for He says the groups want to supporr utilities in their effortxs to provide energy-efficiency programs.
And he says incentives built into the settlement that allow Duke to increasde its rate of return based on achievinvg specified efficiency targets accomplish that Duke also got what it considers an important Duke will be allowed to make a returm on part of what it woulcd have cost to buildx power plants to provide the energy theprogramj saves. Duke has said eliminating compensation basedr onsuch “avoided costs” would be a deal-breaker. Duke contendse such compensation puts efficiency on a more equal footinfg with electricity sales forgenerating profits. Without that kind of Duke has said, efficiency would always take a back seat in business plans.
“The fact that the avoided-cosy model is in there, that it’es based on pay-for-performance and that it is up to us to make sure the programsx really work were all keys to the settlement for says company spokesmanTim Pettit. The public stafrf and environmental groups had opposedthe avoided-costs idea, largelyy on fears that it couldd provide Duke with unreasonable profits. The public staffr also worried about departing from standarcdregulatory practice. In North Carolina, utilities are generalluy allowed to make a return on the moneuthey spend. An avoided-costs model breaks that connection and offers Duke a returmn on money it doesnot spend.
But an importanf concession to the public staff was a decision tomake Save-A-Watt a four-year pilot initiative. The N.C. Utilities Commission will revieaw the program at the end of that period and decide whethef it has performed well enouguh to bemade permanent. The avoided costs outlinedr in the settlement will trac the model Ohio adoptedfor Duke’s version of the Save-A-Watt program in that It reduces the percentage of avoided costs on which Duke can earn a return.
Duke had originallu asked to make a rate of return on 90 percent of what it woulx have cost to provide the energy that was Underthe settlement, Duke will get a return on 50 percenft of the avoided costs for energy-conservation programs and 75 percentt of the avoided costs for programs that shif t use away from peak Like in Ohio, the settlement lets Duke cover what are callexd “lost margins.” Several environmental groups have recognized the need to allow Duke to recover those fixed costs for generating and delivering electricitt when efficiency programs reduce demand. The settlement announced Friday will form the basisd ofa Save-A-Watt proposal Duke will make to S.C.
regulatorsw this summer. The S.C. Public Service Commissiobn rejected Duke’s first proposal in February. Save-A-Watt is an energy-efficiencyg initiative Duke has been touting for The proposal comprises a series of programs to help customerxs use less electricity or shif t their use of powerfrom peak-demand hours to low-use times. Some of the programs — such as discountes for energy-saving light bulbzs and financial incentives tobuy high-efficiencgy appliances — started June 1 in both But neither state has approved the full The has led the environmental groupsz in dissecting the program.
Opponents contended the originap proposal would reward Duke too handsomely and primarily for shiftinyg the use of electricity frombusy times. That wouldf conserve little energy but save utilities Steve Smith, executive director of the says his group’s concern from the beginninh was to make sure Save-A-Watt resulted in significant reductiona in energy use. In Northn Carolina, the commission approved Save-A-Watt’d programs but withheld judgmenyton Duke’s compensation. The commission asked for additionap comments onthe issue. As opponents were formulating their responsexs tothat request, they and Duke resumed negotiation in North Carolina.
Any settlement here couldr create a template for the program inSouthj Carolina. One key feature of the compromisse will be the creationj of an advisory group that will assisft in reviewingfor Save-A-Watt. Duke Energy Carolinas is a divisionof Charlotte-based (NYSE:DUK).
Friday, February 15, 2013
Daughters' hardship yields lighter sentence for 'Melrose Place' actress - The Star-Ledger - NJ.com
firukendu-anchored.blogspot.com
The Star-Ledger - NJ.com | Daughters' hardship yields lighter sentence for 'Melrose Place' actress The Star-Ledger - NJ.com SOMERVILLE รข€" Saying he had "little or no sympathy for an adult who chooses to drink and drive," a judge in Somerville Thursday sentenced former "Melrose Place" actress Amy Locane-Bovenizer to three years in prison f or her role in a 2010 crash that ... Locane spared longer prison sentence because of sick daughter |
Sunday, February 10, 2013
DCFS: Credible evidence of abuse at Maine West - Chicago Tribune
judonebolayb1394.blogspot.com
CLTV | DCFS: Credible evidence of abuse at Maine West Chicago Tribune The state's child welfare agency has ruled that two staff members at Maine West High School abused and neglected children, a revelation that appears to be linked to a soccer team hazing scandal at the Des Plaines school involving » |
Monday, February 4, 2013
Ford sales climb to highest level since July - Dayton Business Journal:
sucujovide.wordpress.com
But sales were down 24.2 percent compared with May 2008, when the companhy sold 213,238 units. For the first five monthz of 2009, Dearborn, Mich.-based Ford (NYSE: F) sold 620,303 compared with 981,150 units during the same periodr ayear earlier, a 36.8 percent decline. In a sign that buyers mightt be coming back to the luxuryvehicles market, Ford’s Lincoln division reported that it sold 8,5667 units in May, a 2.2 percent increase over May when it sold 8,365 units. Sales of Ford made at the Louisville Assembly Planyt on FernValley Road, declined 34.6 percent, to 5,3145 units from 8,122 units a year ago. Salees of the Mercury Mountaineer, also made at Louisville Assembly, droppeds 45.
2 percent, to 402 from 734 unitsz a year earlier. Saleds of F-Series pickup trucks, including Super Duty trucksw made at the Kentucky Truck Plant on Chamberlain dropped 22.3 percent, to 33,381 units, from 42,974 units in May 2008. Sales of Ford Expedition SUVs, which bega n production at Kentucky Truck Plant in declined40 percent, to 3,150 units from 5,252 units a year earlier. Salesa of the Lincoln also made at KentuckyTruck Plant, droppedr 40.6 percent, to 790 unit from 1,329 units a year earlier. Ford saw year-over-yeat gains in some of its car categories. The compang sold 19,786 Fusion sedans in May, up 9.
4 percentr from the year-earlier period when it sold 18,088 Lincoln sold 1,553 Town Cars in May, up 103.3 percentg from May 2008, when it sold 764 of the luxurh vehicles. Ford’s Volvo division sold 590 of its S60 up 9 percent fromMay 2008, when it sold 542 Also Tuesday, Ford announced a summer promotion to draw more consumers to dealerships. Through June 30, the automakerr will cover as much as three monthx of payments up to and its Ford Crediyt subsidiary will offer zero percent financing on select Lincoln andMercury
But sales were down 24.2 percent compared with May 2008, when the companhy sold 213,238 units. For the first five monthz of 2009, Dearborn, Mich.-based Ford (NYSE: F) sold 620,303 compared with 981,150 units during the same periodr ayear earlier, a 36.8 percent decline. In a sign that buyers mightt be coming back to the luxuryvehicles market, Ford’s Lincoln division reported that it sold 8,5667 units in May, a 2.2 percent increase over May when it sold 8,365 units. Sales of Ford made at the Louisville Assembly Planyt on FernValley Road, declined 34.6 percent, to 5,3145 units from 8,122 units a year ago. Salees of the Mercury Mountaineer, also made at Louisville Assembly, droppeds 45.
2 percent, to 402 from 734 unitsz a year earlier. Saleds of F-Series pickup trucks, including Super Duty trucksw made at the Kentucky Truck Plant on Chamberlain dropped 22.3 percent, to 33,381 units, from 42,974 units in May 2008. Sales of Ford Expedition SUVs, which bega n production at Kentucky Truck Plant in declined40 percent, to 3,150 units from 5,252 units a year earlier. Salesa of the Lincoln also made at KentuckyTruck Plant, droppedr 40.6 percent, to 790 unit from 1,329 units a year earlier. Ford saw year-over-yeat gains in some of its car categories. The compang sold 19,786 Fusion sedans in May, up 9.
4 percentr from the year-earlier period when it sold 18,088 Lincoln sold 1,553 Town Cars in May, up 103.3 percentg from May 2008, when it sold 764 of the luxurh vehicles. Ford’s Volvo division sold 590 of its S60 up 9 percent fromMay 2008, when it sold 542 Also Tuesday, Ford announced a summer promotion to draw more consumers to dealerships. Through June 30, the automakerr will cover as much as three monthx of payments up to and its Ford Crediyt subsidiary will offer zero percent financing on select Lincoln andMercury
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)